Site sponsors





Climate Funds‎ > ‎

Clean Technology Fund

 

Summary

The Clean Technology Fund (CTF) is one of the two (along with the Strategic Climate Fund) multi-donor Trust Funds within the Climate Investment Funds (CIFs). The CIFs have been designed to support low-carbon and climate-resilient development through scaled-up financing channeled through the African Development Bank, Asian Development Bank, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Inter-American Development Bank, and World Bank Group. The CTF aims to support the rapid deployment of low-carbon technologies on a significant scale, with the objective of cost-effective reductions in the growth of greenhouse gas emissions.  


 

Basic Description

Name of Fund

Clean Technology Fund (CTF).

Date created

Date fund proposed: February 2008

Date fund made operational: Approved by the World Bank Board of Directors on July 1, 2008

Administrating organisation

The World Bank is the Trustee of the CTF Trust Fund.  An Administrative Unit for the Climate Investment Funds has been established in the World Bank, in order to (i) manage the meetings of the CIF's Trust Fund Committees and the Strategic Climate Fund (SCF) Sub-Committees, in collaboration with the Multilateral Development Banks; (ii) ensure collaboration and communication among the Multilateral Development Banks and convene meetings of the MDB Committee; and, (iii) promote cooperation with other development partners to advance the objectives of the Climate Investment Funds.

The World Bank Group, the African Development Bank, the Asian Development Bank, the European Development Bank, and the Inter-American Development Bank are the implementing agencies for CTF investments. 

Objectives

The Clean Technology Fund (CTF) is one of the two (along with the Strategic Climate Fund) multi-donor Trust Funds within the Climate Investment Funds (CIF). The CIFs have been designed to support low-carbon and climate-resilient development through scaled-up financing channeled through the African Development Bank, Asian Development Bank, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Inter-American Development Bank, and World Bank Group. The CTF aims to finance transformational actions by:

(a) Providing positive incentives for the demonstration of low carbon development and mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions through public and private sector investments;
(b) Promoting scaled-up deployment, diffusion and transfer of clean technologies by funding low carbon programs and projects that are embedded in national plans and strategies to accelerate their implementation;
(c) Promoting realization of environmental and social co-benefits thus demonstrating the potential for low-carbon technologies to contribute to sustainable development and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals;
(d) Promoting international cooperation on climate change and supporting agreement on the future of the climate change regime;
(e) Utilizing skills and capabilities of the MDBs to raise and deliver new and additional resources, including official and concessional funding, at significant scale; and
(f) Providing experience and lessons in responding to the challenge of climate change through learning-by-doing.

Donor contributions

Pledged: The total amount pledged by eight countries to the CTF is US$ eq. 4.378 billion as of June 2010 (depends on exchange rates). 

Pledges to the Clean Technology Fund (CTF) 

Country
 
 Contribution Type  Amount (in millions)  Currency
Australia  Grant  100  AUD
France
 Loan  203 EUR
Germany  Loan  500  EUR
Japan  Grant  1,000  USD
Spain  Capital  80  EUR
Sweden  Grant  600  SEK
United Kingdom*  Capital  385  GBP
United States  Grant 1,400  USD
Total   4.378 Bn  USD eq.
* Amount pledged to the SCF and allocated to the CTF.
 
Deposited: The Trustee has received payments totalling roughly USD eq. 450 million from the following donors: Australia (AUD 50 million), Spain (EUR 10 million), Sweden (SEK 300 million) and the United Kingdom (GBP 230 million).

Activities supported

The Clean Technology Fund will invest in projects and programs that contribute to demonstration, deployment and transfer of low carbon technologies with a significant potential for long term greenhouse gas emissions savings. As country circumstances differ, investment programs will be developed on a country-specific basis to achieve nationally-defined objectives. Options include programs and large-scaled projects:

 (a) At the sectoral or sub-sectoral level in a given country;

 (b) Sub-nationally, by focusing activity on a particular province/state/municipality;

 (c) Regionally, particularly where regional cooperation is required;

 (d) Through the private sector, or public-private partnerships.

Potential sectors for CTF investments are in the power sector (renewable energy, as well as increased efficiency in generation, transmission and distribution); transportation (modal shifts to public transportation, improved fuel economy, and fuel switching); and large scale adoption of energy efficient technologies in the industrial, commercial and residential building sectors.

Conditions and eligibility requirements

Country access will be based on:

(a) ODA-eligibility (according to OECD/DAC guidelines); and
(b) an active multilateral development bank (MDB) country program.

The CTF Trust Fund Committee envisages that resources of the fund should not be spread too thinly if the fund is to achieve its objectives.  Therefore, it is expected that fifteen to twenty investment plans for CTF co-financing should be prepared for consideration by the Trust Fund Committee. The investment plan is “business plan” of the multilateral development banks (MDBs), developed under the leadership of the government, to assist a country with CTF co-financing in implementing its national development strategies and programs with low carbon objectives.  The investment plan is agreed among, and owned by, the government and the MDBs. 

When an eligible country (or group of countries) expresses interest in accessing in CTF financing, the MDBs jointly assess the potential for investments in the country (or countries, in the case of multi-country approaches) to meet CTF criteria for significant GHG emissions savings, demonstration potential at scale, development impact and implementation potential. 

Investment criteria for public sector operations has been approved, and can be accessed here: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTCC/Resources/CTFInvestmentCriteriarevisedcleanJan16.pdf
 
The CTF determines a project’s eligibility and the level of financing on the basis of whether it will have a “transformative” effect by supporting programs that would not have been viable without concessional finance. One component of this approach assesses the potential impact of CTF financing on the risks and costs of deploying clean technologies. CTF programs are intended to “stimulate lasting changes in the structure or function of a sub-sector, sector or market” and “demonstrate how CTF co-financing could be used, possibly in combination with revenues from emissions reductions, to make low GHG emissions investments financially attractive by improving the internal rates of return on such investments.

Funds disbursed to date

Cumulative disbursements (as of Oct 2009) include USD 5 million for projects and USD 4.3 million for administration (total = 9.3).

The cumulative funding decisions made by the CTF Trust Fund Committee as of July 2010 amount to USD 652 million. See projects listed below.

Uptake and projects supported

The Fund has moved into implementation phase. As of July, 2010, the Trust Fund Committee has endorsed 13 Investment Plans for a pipeline of 57 planned projects amounting to $4.35 billion in CTF funding. Endorsed investment plans include the following:

 

Country / region

CTF endorsed allocation in US$ millions

Colombia

150

Egypt

300

Indonesia

400

Kazakhstan

200

Mexico

500

Morocco

150

The Philippines

250

South Africa

500

Thailand

300

Turkey

250

Ukraine

350

Vietnam

250

regional Middle East and North Africa 

750

Total

 $                                                          4,350

These endorsed Investment Plans, totalling $4.35 billion, are projected to leverage an additional $36 billion in co-financing.

 

To date, the Trust Fund Committee has approved the following projects for a total of $652 million.

Project

Amount (USD mn)

IBRD's Egypt: Wind Power Development Project

150.00

Mexico Renewable Energy Program

53.38

Mexico's Urban Transport Transformation Program

200.00

Mexico's Private Sector Wind Development (Sub-Project- IFC's EDF La Ventosa)

15.60

Thailand's Renewable Energy Accelerator Program

40.00

Turkey Private Sector Sustainable Energy Financing Facility (TurSEFF)

43.25

Turkey's Commercializing Sustainable Energy Finance Program

21.70

Turkey's Private Sector Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Project 

100.00

Ukraine Renewables Direct Lending Facility 

27.60

Total projects approved

651.53

 

Proposed life of fund

The design of the CTF includes a “sunset clause” stating that “the CTF will take necessary steps to conclude its operations once a new [UNFCCC] financial architecture is effective.”6 Any funds remaining in the CTF once this new architecture has been established may be transferred to “another fund that has a similar objective”. If the UNFCCC negotiations result in a renewed mandate for the CTF, operations may continue with appropriate adjustments in priorities or programs.

Further information

For general information, meeting documents, governance framework, Trustee reports, investment criteria, operations summaries, and annual reports, visit: http://www.climateinvestmentfunds.org/cif/node/2

Nakhooda, Smita (March 2010) 'Clean Technology Fund: Insights for Development and Climate Finance' WRI Working Paper. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C. http://www.wri.org/publication/clean-technology-fund-insights-for-development-and-climate-finance
 

 

Fund Governance

Decision-making structure for fund disbursement

Decision-making will be by consensus of the voting members of the Trust Fund Committee. If consensus is not possible, then a proposed decision will be postponed or withdrawn.

The Trust Fund Committee will be responsible for:

  • Approving programming and pipeline priorities, operational criteria and financing modalities; 
  • Ensuring that the strategic orientation of the CTF is guided by the principles of the UNFCCC; 
  • Endorsing further development of activities in investment plans for trust fund financing;
  • Approving trust fund financing for programs, projects and administrative budgets.

The Trust Fund Committee will consist of:

(a) Eight representatives from donor countries or groups of such countries to the CTF identified through a consultation among such donors, and eight representatives from eligible recipient countries or groups of such countries identified through a consultation among interested recipient countries; provided; however, (i) if there are less than eight donor countries contributing to the CTF during the first year of the CTF operations, potential donor countries, identified through a consultation among the donor and potential donor countries, may serve as representatives from donor countries, and (ii) if there are less than eight donor countries contributing to the CTF in the subsequent years, the number of donor country representatives and recipient country representatives, respectively, shall be reduced to equal the number of actual donors contributing to the CTF. Representatives will serve for two year terms, except that they may serve for a one year term for the first year of the CTF operations and terms will be staggered so not all representatives are replaced each year. Representatives may be reappointed;

(b) Whenever the Trust Fund Committee considers an investment plan for a country or a program or project to be financed by the fund, the recipient country concerned will be invited to participate in the Trust Fund Committee during its deliberations on the work program, program or project;

(c) A senior representative of the World Bank, recognizing the role of the World Bank as the overall coordinator of the CIF partnership;

(d) A representative of the MDB partners to be identified by the MDB Committee and chosen on the basis of rotation among the MDBs .

A number of stakeholders are observers to the deliberations of the CTF committee, including the secretariat of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Global Environment Facility (GEF). Two representatives of the private sector or business associations (one from a recipient country and one from a contributor country) and four representatives of civil society are also included as observers. These observers have been appointed through a processes of “self selection” coordinated by the World Business Council for Sustainable Development for the private sector, and by the Washington, DC based NGO Resolve for civil society in 2009.8 All observer roles are “active”, which allows them to request the floor to make interventions, propose agenda items, and recommend experts. The World Bank and its partners periodically host a “Partnership Forum” to share lessons learned from the CIF with a range of stakeholders, and to seek expert input Programs. The first forum was held in October 2008, and the second in March 2010
 
However, not all sessions of the CTF committee meetings are open to observers. Deliberations over investment plans are at present closed “executive sessions”. As administrator of the fund, the World Bank has sought to ensure that CTF disclosure practice is consistent with its disclosure policy, and hesitated to exceed those standards. In May 2009, the Trust Fund Committee agreed to publicly disclose Clean Technology Plans prior to their meetings. Previously these plans were not disclosed until after they had been approved in principle by the committee. In October 2009, the decision was made to allow observers to attend country and MDB presentations of the investment plans, and provide brief comments. The actual discussion of the plan continues to exclude observers. In November 2009, the civil society and private sector observers made a formal request to the chairs of the CTF trust fund committee to include observers in all sessions of the meetings. A formal response to that request had not been made as of the March CTF meeting.

Consultations with non-government stakeholders

In designing the Climate Investment Funds, consultations took place with potential donors and recipients, the United Nations family, other multilateral development banks (MDBs), civil society organizations, and the private sector.  At a final design meeting, held in Potsdam, Germany, on May 21-22, 2008, representatives from some 40 developing and industrialized countries agreed to create the CIF.

The Fund includes a Partnership Forum – a broad-based meeting of stakeholders, including donor and eligible recipient countries, MDBs, UN and UN agencies, GEF, UNFCCC, the Adaptation Fund, bilateral development agencies, NGOs, private sector entities, and scientific and technical experts. The group will be convened annually to provide a forum for dialogue on the strategic directions, results and impacts of the CIF. The Partnership Forum will be co-chaired by the World Bank Vice President for the Sustainable Development Network and a country representative elected by countries participating in the Partnership Forum.

The Partnership Forum will be a meeting for dialogue and consultation and will not lead to written outcomes, such as agreed texts or declarations, which could be used as a basis for discussions in the UNFCCC.

The ‘Proposal for inviting representatives of civil society to observe meetings of the CIF Trust Fund Committees’ was presented to the CTF Committee Meeting (29 Jan, 2009). At the January 29, 2009 CTF Committee meeting, it was decided that four civil society positions will be created, and will include local groups, indigenous people, and research/technical NGOs. Two private sector positions will be established as observers.

How fund disbursement is reported

Disclosure policy
In May 2009, the Trust Fund Committees approved a disclosure policy that calls for country-owned investment plans and strategies developed under each of the Trust Funds to be disclosed in-country prior to their submission to a CIF Committee for approval. Proposed plans are also posted on the CIF website no later than 3 weeks prior to review of the proposal by a Committee.  In the case of proposed programs and projects, an information document describing the proposal is to be made public at least two weeks prior to a decision on the funding of the proposal. The policy recognizes that a country or a project proposer may have justifiable reasons for not publicly disclosing all information in an investment plan or project. In this case, certain information may be kept confidential. This is to be done only on an exceptional basis, and non-disclosure of information is to be justified to the Committee

Issues raised by the public

Observers have stressed the need to tackle the policy, institutional and regulatory barriers to low carbon development if the CTF is to fulfil its aim of sustained and transformative impacts. These factors are not currently adequately addressed in CTF analysis or monitoring. There are also calls for efforts to strengthen countries' capacities to produce low carbon technologies themselves.

In an April critique of the Middle East and North Africa plan for concentrated solar power, the Bank Information Center argued that the plan promoted energy for export rather than increased access, involved water-intensive technology in a water-scarce region, and engaged insufficiently with regional civil society.
A good overview of the CTF and related issues can be found in:  Nakhooda, Smita (March 2010) 'Clean Technology Fund: Insights for Development and Climate Finance' WRI Working Paper. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C. http://www.wri.org/publication/clean-technology-fund-insights-for-development-and-climate-finance

The MDBs administrative and overhead charges have been a cause of concern for some governments. (http://www.wri.org/publication/clean-technology-fund-insights-for-development-and-climate-finance)

While the US originally pledged $2 billion to the CTF under the Bush administration, the U.S. Congress and Senate did not approve this appropriation in the 2009 budget. This is because several lawmakers, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), opposed the bank's plan to allow some efficient coal-fired power plants to be considered "clean" (for information on the World Bank’s memo describing conditions under which it would use the CTF to finance coal and gas projects, see: CTF Criteria for Financing Low Carbon Opportunities in Coal and Gas Power Investments). The document states that coal power stations may receive CTF financing if they meet or surpass a certain level of efficiency - meaning they must emit less than 0.795 tonnes of carbon dioxide for every megawatt hour of power produced. The World Bank's own data shows that standard coal power stations built in rich nations emit 0.8 tonnes of CO2 per MWh. (For more information, see: http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn16683-green-funding-for-coal-power-plants-criticised.html and
http://blogs.cgdev.org/globaldevelopment/2009/02/end_of_the_road_for_the_world_1.php#more).
 
The primary concern raised in a briefing document to the US Congress about the CTF involves the types of “clean” technologies the World Bank may support. Several Members have questioned whether the CTF should be “technology neutral,” thus allowing CTF resources to fund carbon based investments. This was the central debate during a June 5, 2008 House Financial Services Committee hearing on the CTF. (see presentations here: http://www.house.gov/apps/list/hearing/financialsvcs_dem/hr060608.shtml)

Some believe that the CTF Partnership Forum is an inadequate provision for proper inclusion and consultation of civil-society stakeholders.A more formal role for representatives of civil society in the governance of the fund – perhaps as an independent technical expert –would be valuable. (see: http://www.wri.org/publication/us-contributions-world-bank-clean-technology-fund)

The Trust Fund Committee approved a proposal for Civil Society representatives to observe meetings of the Trust Fund Committee in January 2009.

The World Bank’s CIFs will create parallel structures for financing climate change adaptation and The SCF has been criticised by civil society groups for creating parallel structures for financing climate change adaptation and mitigation outside the ongoing multilateral framework for climate change negotiations and within a process dominated by G8 countries. Developing countries have long argued for greater commitments and increases in financial resources under the UNFCCC to enable them to fulfil their obligations under the Convention but have maintained that such resources should be placed under the guidance of the state parties to the Convention to ensure consistency with internationally agreed priorities and principles (See: Celine Tan, Third World Network, ‘World Bank’s Climate Funds Will Undermine Global Climate Action’ 10 April 2008: www.twnside.org.sg/title2/finance/docs/Climate.Funds-Commentary.Revised.doc).

The CIFs are also criticised for the significant speed at which they have been designed, promoted and implemented without due consultation with wider stakeholders. (See: Celine Tan, Third World Network, ‘No additionality, new conditionality: a critique of the World Bank’s Climate Investment Funds’ Briefing Paper 2, 2008: www.foe.org/pdf/CIF_TWNanalysis.pdf).

The language of the Fund has been criticised for implying recognition of the UNFCCC principles as merely guidance for the Fund’s policies rather than as binding internationally negotiated commitments of state parties which must be respected. They also demonstrate a lack of familiarity with the principles negotiated under the Convention and the legal status of commitments under the UNFCCC (see: http://www.twnside.org.sg/title2/finance/twninfofinance20080510.htm).

 
 

Relationship with Official Development Assistance

Is donor funding considered part of official development assistance?

Since CIF is a pooled multi-donor trust fund managed by the World Bank, an international development institution recognized as such by the DAC for the purpose of ODA eligibility, these contributions can be scored as multilateral ODA. The outgoing use of all CIF resources as concessional loans, grants, and guarantees through the MDBs can be reported by each MDB as ODA if: (a) it meets the criterion of promoting economic development and welfare; b) the grant element is at least 25 percent; and c) funds are to be used in a country included in DAC list of ODA eligible countries.

Financial instrument/ delivery mechanism used (e.g. grant, loan)

The CTF will use a blend of financial instruments, including grants, concessional loans and guarantees to make investing in low carbon technologies more attractive to both public and private sector investors in the developing countries. It will also be a collaborative effort between the World Bank and other MDBs, through an investments plan for each country of operation prepared under the leadership of the country government.

The CTF, through the MDBs will seek to:

  • Finance at scale in the near-to-medium term to meet investment needs to support rapid deployment of low carbon technologies and increase energy efficiency;
  • Optimize blending with MDB financing, as well as with bilateral and other sources of finance, to provide incentives for low carbon development;
  • Provide a range of financial products to leverage greater private sector investments; and
  • Provide financial instruments integrated into mainstream development finance and policy dialogue.

CTF financing will provide a grant element tailored to cover the identifiable additional costs of the investment necessary to make the project viable, thereby providing the appropriate incentive to facilitate deployment of low carbon technologies at scale.

The share of funding allocated to an MDB will be based on country requests, the quality of proposals, the comparative advantage of the MDB and experience in a region/country. The MDBs will rely on their own policies and procedures in developing and managing activities that the CTF will finance, and report directly to the CTF Trust Fund Committee on operational matters. The MDBs will be invited to present their views on items under consideration by the CTF Trust Fund Committee.

The terms of CTF financing are as follows:

   Harder concessional Softer concessional 
Maturity  20 40 
Grace period  10 10 
 Principal repayment (Yr 11-20)  10%  2%
 Principal repayment (Yr 20-40)  N/A 4% 
 MDB Fee Fiscal Year 09-10  0.10% 0.10% 
 Service Charge Fiscal Year 09-10  0.75% 0.25% 
 Grant Element  45% 75% 

source: Climate Investment Funds 'Clean Technology Fund Financing Products, Terms, and Review Procedures for Public Sector Operations', May 28, 2009.

Nature of recipient country involvement

A selection of eight eligible recipient countries will participate in the CTF Trust Fund Committee as voting members. A selection of eligible recipient countries (matching in number of contributor countries) will participate in the SCF Sub-Committee and participate as voting members.

Whenever the Trust Fund Committee considers an investment plan for a country or a program or project to be financed by the fund, the recipient country concerned will be invited to participate in the Trust Fund Committee during its deliberations on the work program, program or project.

Recipient countries will also be invited to the Partnership Forum meeting of stakeholders, which does not have voting members nor written outcomes and only serves as a forum for dialog and discussion.

Overall consistency with the aid effectiveness agenda (i.e. the Paris Declaration)

The CTF investment plan must align with recipient countries’ national development plans, and must take account of on-going MDB operations in key sectors or sub-sectors in the country. It is envisaged that the government will play a central role in programming of the CTF’s public sector related projects and in donor coordination.

The CTF document states ‘Activities financed by the fund should be based on a country-led approach and should be integrated into country-owned development strategies, consistent with the Paris Declaration’.

 

  Sign in   Recent Site Activity   Terms   Report Abuse   Print page  |  Powered by Google Sites